PeakStream is not the ideal solution
February 27, 2011
Posted by on
This has been on my mind for a while.
Why recreate PeakStream? The technology would be five years old. Clearly, the market has changed since then. We can be fairly certain the best solution for today is different.
So to be clear: PeakStream is not the ideal solution. However, it is the lowest hanging fruit within reach and a good step towards better solutions. I believe that PeakStream, as a company faced with product design choices, came to the same conclusion.
A native code platform like PeakStream is clearly not the future. The market wants virtual machine languages.
So if PeakStream is not the future, why build it?
I believe it is a necessary intermediate step for the following reasons.
- Useful for solving problems today
- Can be done “quickly” for reasonable cost
- Lessons learned inform future work
This is why I see it as important to get the technology working soon. Technology rots even when it doesn’t exist. Ideas and concepts are valid for only a few years before the world changes too much.